Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
Baseball
May 04 5:30 PM
Audio Video Live stats
SAC TBA SAC TBA
Carson-Newman vs. Carson-Newman
Baseball
May 04 7:30 PM
Live stats
Tusculum Tusculum
Lenoir-Rhyne vs. Lenoir-Rhyne
Softball
May 05 10:00 AM
Video Live stats
Anderson Anderson
Lenoir-Rhyne at Lenoir-Rhyne
Softball
May 05 12:00 PM
Video Live stats
Lenoir-Rhyne Lenoir-Rhyne
Anderson at Anderson
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
South Atlantic Conference

Player Stats

played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp comp att pct yds y/g y/a td int lg effic
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
4 J Scott Limestone 10 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 1 2 50.0% 27 2.5 13.5 0 0 27 163.4
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 1 4 25.0% 71 6.5 17.8 1 0 71 256.6
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
10 B Irby Newberry 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rush yds y/g avg td lg fum lost
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 - - - - - - 1 1
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 7 71 6.5 10.1 1 39 2 1
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 9 101 10.1 11.2 0 38 - -
4 J Scott Limestone 10 7 4 0.4 0.6 0 4 - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 1 1 0.1 1.0 0 1 3 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 15 23 2.1 1.5 3 18 2 2
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 1 15 1.4 15.0 0 15 - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 11 16 93 8.5 5.8 0 22 1 1
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 3 24 2.0 8.0 0 10 - -
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rec rec/g yds y/g avg td lg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 36 3.0 680 56.7 18.9 11 81
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 39 3.5 726 66.0 18.6 4 64
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 33 3.3 581 58.1 17.6 8 57
4 J Scott Limestone 10 40 4.0 681 68.1 17.0 7 75
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 35 3.9 571 63.4 16.3 6 80
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 33 3.0 524 47.6 15.9 4 65
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 97 8.8 1325 120.5 13.7 14 75
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 35 3.2 447 40.6 12.8 3 39
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 37 3.4 434 39.5 11.7 1 32
10 B Irby Newberry 11 34 3.1 378 34.4 11.1 3 43
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 38 3.2 386 32.2 10.2 2 40
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp fgm fga pct lg xpm xpa pct pts
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 - - - - - - - 0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 - - - - - - - 0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 - - - - 0 0 - 0
4 J Scott Limestone 10 - - - - - - - 0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 - - - - - - - 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - 0
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 - - - - 0 0 - 0
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 - - - - - - - 0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - 0
10 B Irby Newberry 11 - - - - - - - 0
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 - - - - - - - 0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp punt yds avg lg in20 fc tb blk
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 - - - - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 - - - - - - - -
4 J Scott Limestone 10 - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - -
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 11 - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team kr yds avg td lg pr yds avg td lg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman - - - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 2 43 21.5 0 22 - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate - - - - - 10 135 13.5 0 37
4 J Scott Limestone - - - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill - - - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 3 39 13.0 0 22 21 256 12.2 1 84
8 A Belanger Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 23 473 20.6 0 44 - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry - - - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 18 470 26.1 1 95 13 145 11.2 0 56
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rush rcv pr kr yds ypg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 - 680 - - 680 56.7
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 71 726 - 43 840 76.4
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 101 581 135 - 817 81.7
4 J Scott Limestone 10 4 681 - - 685 68.5
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 1 571 - - 572 63.6
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 - 524 - - 524 47.6
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 23 1325 256 39 1643 149.4
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 15 447 - - 462 42.0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 - 434 - 473 907 82.5
10 B Irby Newberry 11 93 378 - - 471 42.8
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 24 386 145 470 1025 85.4
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team pts pts/g rush rec kr pr int fum xpm fgm 2pt misc
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 66 5.5 - 11 - - - - - - - 0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 30 2.7 1 4 0 - - - - - - 0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 50 5.0 0 8 - 0 - - 0 - 1 0
4 J Scott Limestone 42 4.2 0 7 - - - - - - - 0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 36 4.0 0 6 - - - - - - - 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 24 2.2 - 4 - - - - - - - 0
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 108 9.8 3 14 0 1 - - 0 - 0 0
8 A Belanger Tusculum 18 1.6 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 6 0.5 - 1 0 - - - - - - 0
10 B Irby Newberry 18 1.6 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
11 R Simmons Wingate 18 1.5 0 2 1 0 - - - - - 0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp tkl ast tot tkl/g sck yds tfl yds ff fr yds int yds brup blk
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 12 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 11 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 10 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
4 J Scott Limestone 10 1 1 2.0 .2 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 9 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 11 5 3 8.0 .7 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 11 2 0 2.0 .2 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
8 A Belanger Tusculum 11 2 1 3.0 .3 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 11 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 11 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp comp att pct yds y/g y/a td int lg effic
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
4 J Scott Limestone 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 1 2 50.0% 27 3.4 13.5 0 0 27 163.4
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 0 2 .0% 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
10 B Irby Newberry 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rush yds y/g avg td lg fum lost
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 3 19 2.4 6.3 0 14 - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 8 96 16.0 12.0 0 38 - -
4 J Scott Limestone 8 6 0 0.0 0.0 0 4 - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 1 1 0.1 1.0 0 1 3 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 10 -9 -1.1 -0.9 2 7 2 2
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 1 15 1.9 15.0 0 15 - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 8 10 50 6.3 5.0 0 10 1 1
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 2 14 1.8 7.0 0 10 - -
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rec rec/g yds y/g avg td lg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 20 2.5 415 51.9 20.8 7 81
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 30 3.8 607 75.9 20.2 3 64
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 18 3.0 261 43.5 14.5 3 45
4 J Scott Limestone 8 34 4.3 557 69.6 16.4 6 57
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 31 4.4 493 70.4 15.9 6 80
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 20 2.5 309 38.6 15.4 2 42
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 76 9.5 1004 125.5 13.2 10 75
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 26 3.3 358 44.8 13.8 3 39
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 29 3.6 334 41.8 11.5 1 32
10 B Irby Newberry 8 22 2.8 218 27.3 9.9 3 43
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 30 3.8 318 39.8 10.6 1 40
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp fgm fga pct lg xpm xpa pct pts
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - - - - - - - 0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 - - - - - - - 0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 - - - - 0 0 - 0
4 J Scott Limestone 8 - - - - - - - 0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 - - - - - - - 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - 0
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 - - - - 0 0 - 0
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 - - - - - - - 0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - 0
10 B Irby Newberry 8 - - - - - - - 0
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 - - - - - - - 0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp punt yds avg lg in20 fc tb blk
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 - - - - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 - - - - - - - -
4 J Scott Limestone 8 - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - -
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 8 - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team kr yds avg td lg pr yds avg td lg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman - - - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry - - - - - - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate - - - - - 4 34 8.5 0 15
4 J Scott Limestone - - - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill - - - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 3 39 13.0 0 22 16 240 15.0 1 84
8 A Belanger Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 20 399 19.9 0 44 - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry - - - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 9 264 29.3 1 95 11 89 8.1 0 33
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp rush rcv pr kr yds ypg
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - 415 - - 415 51.9
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 19 607 - - 626 78.3
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 96 261 34 - 391 65.2
4 J Scott Limestone 8 0 557 - - 557 69.6
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 1 493 - - 494 70.6
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 - 309 - - 309 38.6
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 -9 1004 240 39 1274 159.3
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 15 358 - - 373 46.6
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 - 334 - 399 733 91.6
10 B Irby Newberry 8 50 218 - - 268 33.5
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 14 318 89 264 685 85.6
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team pts pts/g rush rec kr pr int fum xpm fgm 2pt misc
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 42 5.3 - 7 - - - - - - - 0
2 D Kitchings Newberry 18 2.3 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 20 3.3 0 3 - 0 - - 0 - 1 0
4 J Scott Limestone 36 4.5 0 6 - - - - - - - 0
5 T Ponder Tusculum 36 5.1 0 6 - - - - - - - 0
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 12 1.5 - 2 - - - - - - - 0
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 78 9.8 2 10 0 1 - - 0 - 0 0
8 A Belanger Tusculum 18 2.3 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 6 0.8 - 1 0 - - - - - - 0
10 B Irby Newberry 18 2.3 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
11 R Simmons Wingate 12 1.5 0 1 1 0 - - - - - 0
played in 75% of team games and 3 receptions per game
Rk Name Team gp tkl ast tot tkl/g sck yds tfl yds ff fr yds int yds brup blk
1 B Westfield Carson-Newman 8 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
2 D Kitchings Newberry 8 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
3 B Muckelvene Wingate 6 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
4 J Scott Limestone 8 1 1 2.0 .3 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
5 T Ponder Tusculum 7 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
6 J Harbison Mars Hill 8 5 2 7.0 .9 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
7 C Rucker Mars Hill 8 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
8 A Belanger Tusculum 8 2 1 3.0 .4 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
9 T Ferguson Mars Hill 8 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
10 B Irby Newberry 8 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
11 R Simmons Wingate 8 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -