Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
M Golf
May 10
Live Results
vs. NCAA Southeast Regional
Softball
May 10 1:00 PM
Recap Video Live stats
Anderson Anderson
Lander vs. Lander
Baseball
May 10 4:00 PM
Live stats
Lincoln Memorial Lincoln Memorial
Wingate vs. Wingate
M Golf
May 11
Live Results
vs. NCAA Southeast Regional
Baseball
May 11 12:00 PM
Live stats
Wingate Wingate
Lincoln Memorial vs. Lincoln Memorial
W Tennis
May 11 2:00 PM
Live stats
Catawba Catawba
Wingate vs. Wingate
Baseball
May 11 3:00 PM
Live stats
Lincoln Memorial Lincoln Memorial
Wingate vs. Wingate
M Lacrosse
May 12 1:00 PM
Live stats
Limestone Limestone
Lenoir-Rhyne at Lenoir-Rhyne
W Golf
May 21
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 22
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 23
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 24
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 25
vs. NCAA Championships
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
M Golf
May 10
Live Results
vs. NCAA Southeast Regional
M Golf
May 11
Live Results
vs. NCAA Southeast Regional
Composite
W Golf
May 21
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 22
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 23
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 24
vs. NCAA Championships
W Golf
May 25
vs. NCAA Championships
Composite
Composite
W Tennis
May 11 2:00 PM
Live stats
Catawba Catawba
Wingate vs. Wingate
Composite
South Atlantic Conference

Player Stats

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp comp att pct yds y/g y/a td int lg effic
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 3 5 60.0% 54 4.9 10.8 0 0 27 150.7
2 E Watts Brevard 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rush yds y/g avg td lg fum lost
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 11 1 4 0.4 4.0 0 4 - -
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 1 7 0.7 7.0 0 7 - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rec rec/g yds y/g avg td lg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 11 24 2.2 316 28.7 13.2 3 29
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp fgm fga pct lg xpm xpa pct pts
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 - - - - - - - 0
2 E Watts Brevard 11 - - - - - - - 0
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - - - - - - 0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 - - - - - - - 0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 3 5 60% 31 32 34 94% 41
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp punt yds avg lg in20 fc tb blk
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 55 2315 42.1 64 25 9 3 0
2 E Watts Brevard 11 49 2121 43.3 64 23 7 3 0
3 J Morris Newberry 11 54 2147 39.8 68 20 6 6 1
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 48 1863 38.8 60 17 11 3 2
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 67 2493 37.2 57 14 20 3 0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team kr yds avg td lg pr yds avg td lg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard - - - - - - - - - -
3 J Morris Newberry - - - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill - - - - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba - - - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rush rcv pr kr yds ypg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 - - - - 0 .0
2 E Watts Brevard 11 4 316 - - 320 29.1
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - - - 0 .0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 7 - - - 7 .7
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 - - - - 0 .0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team pts pts/g rush rec kr pr int fum xpm fgm 2pt misc
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 0 0.0 - - - - - - - - 0 0
2 E Watts Brevard 18 1.6 0 3 - - - - - - - 0
3 J Morris Newberry 0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - 0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 0 0.0 0 - - - - - - - - 0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 41 3.7 - - - - - - 32 3 0 0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp tkl ast tot tkl/g sck yds tfl yds ff fr yds int yds brup blk
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 11 1 1 2.0 .2 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 11 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
3 J Morris Newberry 11 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 10 0 1 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 11 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp comp att pct yds y/g y/a td int lg effic
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 2 4 50.0% 35 5.0 8.8 0 0 27 123.5
2 E Watts Brevard 7 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 - - - - - - - - - 0.0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rush yds y/g avg td lg fum lost
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 7 - - - - - - - -
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 - - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rec rec/g yds y/g avg td lg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 7 11 1.6 138 19.7 12.5 0 28
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp fgm fga pct lg xpm xpa pct pts
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 - - - - - - - 0
2 E Watts Brevard 7 - - - - - - - 0
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - - - - - - 0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 - - - - - - - 0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 0 1 0% 0 18 20 90% 18
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp punt yds avg lg in20 fc tb blk
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 34 1459 42.9 64 16 6 2 0
2 E Watts Brevard 7 34 1453 42.7 58 14 5 2 0
3 J Morris Newberry 7 31 1264 40.8 68 12 2 5 1
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 31 1243 40.1 60 8 6 3 1
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 45 1697 37.7 56 11 15 1 0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team kr yds avg td lg pr yds avg td lg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum - - - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard - - - - - - - - - -
3 J Morris Newberry - - - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill - - - - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba - - - - - - - - - -
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp rush rcv pr kr yds ypg
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 - - - - 0 .0
2 E Watts Brevard 7 - 138 - - 138 19.7
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - - - 0 .0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 - - - - 0 .0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 - - - - 0 .0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team pts pts/g rush rec kr pr int fum xpm fgm 2pt misc
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - 0
2 E Watts Brevard 0 0.0 - 0 - - - - - - - 0
3 J Morris Newberry 0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - 0
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - 0
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 18 2.6 - - - - - - 18 0 0 0
played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk Name Team gp tkl ast tot tkl/g sck yds tfl yds ff fr yds int yds brup blk
1 A Rosetti Tusculum 7 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
2 E Watts Brevard 7 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
3 J Morris Newberry 7 - - 0.0 .0 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
4 B Richmond Mars Hill 7 0 1 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -
5 C Hollandsworth Catawba 7 1 0 1.0 .1 - - 0.0 - - - - - - - -