Player Stats

Season

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	comp	att	pct	yds	y/g	y/a	td	int	lg	effic
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	1	1	100.0%	-7	-0.7	-7.0	0	0	0	41.2
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rush	yds	y/g	avg	td	lg	fum	lost
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rec	rec/g	yds	y/g	avg	td	lg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	fgm	fga	pct	lg	xpm	xpa	pct	pts
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	-	-	-	-	0	0	-	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	6	9	67%	47	37	40	93%	55
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	8	11	73%	49	33	34	97%	57
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	punt	yds	avg	lg	in20	fc	tb	blk
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	44	1852	42.1	59	12	14	1	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	56	2332	41.6	56	26	23	2	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	40	1610	40.3	57	12	12	1	0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	56	2210	39.5	70	12	17	4	0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	43	1679	39.0	61	15	12	3	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	49	1860	38.0	47	16	11	2	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	50	1835	36.7	58	17	20	1	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	kr	yds	avg	td	lg	pr	yds	avg	td	lg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rush	rcv	pr	kr	yds	ypg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	-	-	-	-	0	.0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	-	-	-	-	0	.0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	-	-	-	-	0	.0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	-	-	-	-	0	.0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	-	-	0	.0
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	-	-	0	.0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	-	-	0	.0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	pts	pts/g	rush	rec	kr	pr	int	fum	xpm	fgm	2pt	misc
1	A Haynes	Limestone	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	2	0.2	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	-	1	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	55	5.5	-	-	-	-	-	-	37	6	0	0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	57	5.2	-	-	-	-	-	-	33	8	0	0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	tkl	ast	tot	tkl/g	sck	yds	tfl	yds	ff	fr	yds	int	yds	brup	blk
1	A Haynes	Limestone	10	2	0	2.0	.2	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	10	1	0	1.0	.1	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	10	2	0	2.0	.2	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	11	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	11	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	11	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	10	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Season

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	comp	att	pct	yds	y/g	y/a	td	int	lg	effic
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	1	1	100.0%	-7	-1.2	-7.0	0	0	0	41.2
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rush	yds	y/g	avg	td	lg	fum	lost
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rec	rec/g	yds	y/g	avg	td	lg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	fgm	fga	pct	lg	xpm	xpa	pct	pts
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	-	-	-	-	0	0	-	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	5	7	71%	47	20	21	95%	35
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	5	7	71%	49	19	20	95%	34
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	punt	yds	avg	lg	in20	fc	tb	blk
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	28	1217	43.5	59	6	6	1	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	41	1729	42.2	56	22	16	1	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	27	1085	40.2	57	9	9	0	0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	35	1416	40.5	70	9	6	3	0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	23	928	40.3	57	8	8	2	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	26	1003	38.6	47	7	5	1	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	34	1281	37.7	58	14	15	1	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	kr	yds	avg	td	lg	pr	yds	avg	td	lg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	rush	rcv	pr	kr	yds	ypg
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	-	-	-	-	0	.0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	-	-	0	.0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	pts	pts/g	rush	rec	kr	pr	int	fum	xpm	fgm	2pt	misc
1	A Haynes	Limestone	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	-	0	0
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	35	5.8	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	5	0	0
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	34	4.9	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	5	0	0
5	C Birozes	Wingate	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
6	C Berry	Catawba	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

played in 75% of games and 3.6 attempts per game
Rk	Name	Team	gp	tkl	ast	tot	tkl/g	sck	yds	tfl	yds	ff	fr	yds	int	yds	brup	blk
1	A Haynes	Limestone	7	2	0	2.0	.3	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	H Cantrell	Tusculum	7	1	0	1.0	.1	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
3	E Holbert	Carson-Newman	6	1	0	1.0	.2	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
4	S Rodgers	Newberry	7	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
5	C Birozes	Wingate	7	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6	C Berry	Catawba	7	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
7	H Burgiel	Lenoir-Rhyne	7	-	-	0.0	.0	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-